Bicycling over a Lifetime Is Associated with Less Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the relationship between a history of bicycling and symptomatic and structural outcomes of knee osteoarthritis (OA), the most common form of arthritis. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study within the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), where we investigated OAI participants with complete data on bicycling, knee pain, and radiographic evidence of knee OA. We used a self-administered questionnaire at the 96-month OAI visit to identify participation in bicycling during four time periods throughout a participant's lifetime (ages 12-18, 19-34, 35-49, and > 50 years old). Using logistic regression, we evaluated the influence of prior bicycling status (any history, history for each time period, number of periods cycling) on three outcomes at the 48-month OAI visit: frequent knee pain, radiographic OA (ROA), and symptomatic radiographic OA (SOA), adjusting for age and gender. RESULTS: 2607 participants were included; 44.2% were male; mean age was 64.3 (SD 9.0) years; body mass index was 28.5 (SD 4.9) kg/m 2 . The adjusted risk ratio for the outcome of frequent knee pain, ROA, and SOA among those who reported any history of bicycling compared to non-bicyclers was 0.83 (0.73-0.92), 0.91 (0.85-0.98), and 0.79 (0.68-0.90), respectively. We observed a dose-response among those who participated in bicycling during more time periods. CONCLUSIONS: People who participated in bicycling had a lower prevalence of frequent knee pain, ROA, and SOA. The benefit appeared cumulative. This study indicates that bicycling may be favorable to knee health and should be encouraged.

Ultrasound-detected effusion-synovitis is associated with greater limb loading rate asymmetry during walking post-ACL reconstruction: A pilot study.

Objective: Chronic inflammation and altered walking biomechanics are common after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and contribute to the development of osteoarthritis. Clinically accessible techniques are needed to monitor inflammation (ultrasound-assessed effusion-synovitis) and walking biomechanics (force-measuring insoles), and they must improve the translation of these assessments and determine whether inflammation and walking biomechanics are related in patients after ACLR. This study aimed to determine the association between ultrasound-detected knee effusion-synovitis and limb loading asymmetries during walking in patients 1-5 years post-ACLR. Design: 15 participants (9 women; age: 26 ± 6yrs; mass: 71 ± 15 kg; height: 173 ± 9 cm; months post-ACLR: 29 ± 13) were included in this cross-sectional study. Knee effusion-synovitis was assessed using a standardized protocol and graded using a validated scoring atlas (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) in the ACLR limb. Force-measuring insoles were used to capture the vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during a one-minute treadmill walking trial. Limb symmetry indices (LSIs) were used to quantify limb loading asymmetry for the peak vGRF and the instantaneous loading rate (vGRF-LR). Spearman correlations determined whether effusion-synovitis grade was associated with peak vGRF and vGRF-LR LSI. Results: Effusion-synovitis was present in the ACLR limb of 13/15 (87 %) participants (Grade 0: n = 2; Grade 1: n = 8; Grade 2: n = 4, Grade 3: n = 1). Effusion-synovitis grade was not significantly associated with peak vGRF LSI (mean±sd: 98.0 ± 5.6; ρ = 0.38, p = 0.162), but was significantly associated with vGRF-LR LSI (98.2 ± 11.4; ρ = 0.55, p = 0.035). Conclusion: Most participants 1-5 years post-ACLR have ultrasound-detected effusion-synovitis. Participants with more severe effusion-synovitis load their ACLR limb more rapidly. This study highlights the utility of clinically accessible techniques in assessing inflammation and walking biomechanics in ACLR patients.

Persistent Early Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms in the First Two Years After ACL Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Early identification of knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) could enable timely interventions to improve long-term outcomes. However, little is known about the change in early OA symptoms from 6 to 12 months following ACLR. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change over time in meeting classification criteria for early knee OA symptoms from 6 to 12 months following ACLR. DESIGN: Prospective Cohort Study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: 82 participants aged 13-35 years who underwent unilateral primary ACLR. On average, participants' 1st and 2nd visits were 6.2 and 12.1 months post-ACLR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Early OA symptoms were classified using generic (Luyten Original) and patient population-specific (Luyten PASS) thresholds on Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales. Changes in meeting early OA criteria were compared between an initial and follow-up visit at an average of 6 and 12 months post-ACLR, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-two percent of participants exhibited persistent early OA symptoms across both visits using both the Luyten Original and PASS criteria. From initial to follow-up visit, 18-27% had resolution of early OA symptoms while 4-9% developed incident symptoms. In total, 48-51% had no early OA symptoms at either visit. There were no differences between change in early OA status between adults and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one quarter of participants exhibited persistent early knee OA symptoms based on KOOS thresholds from 6 to 12 months post-ACLR. Determining if this symptom persistence predicts worse long-term outcomes could inform the need for timely interventions after ACLR. Future research should examine if resolving persistent symptoms in this critical window improves later outcomes. Tracking early OA symptoms over time may identify high-risk patients who could benefit from early treatment.

Lower Extremity Reaction Time in Individuals With Contact Versus Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries After Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Deficits in perceptual-motor function, like visuomotor reaction time (VMRT), are risk factors for primary and secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Noncontact ACL injuries have been associated with slower reaction time, but whether this association exists for patients with contact ACL injuries is unknown. Exploring differences in VMRT among individuals with contact versus noncontact ACL injuries may provide a more comprehensive understanding of modifiable risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To compare lower extremity VMRT (LEVMRT) in individuals with contact or noncontact ACL injuries after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 36 participants with primary, unilateral ACLR completed an LEVMRT assessment (contact ACL injury = 20 [56%], noncontact ACL injury = 16 [44%]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The LEVMRT was assessed bilaterally and collected using a series of wireless light discs deactivated by individuals with their feet. The ACLR-active LEVMRT (ie, ACLR limb is deactivating lights) and ACLR-stable LEVMRT were compared using separate analyses of covariance to determine the association with contact or noncontact injury using time since surgery as a covariate. RESULTS: After controlling for time since surgery, a difference and large effect size between groups was found for the ACLR-stable LEVMRT (P = .010; η2 = 0.250) but not for the ACLR-active (P = .340; η2 = 0.065) condition. The contact group exhibited slower ACLR-stable LEVMRT (521.7 ± 59.3 milliseconds) than the noncontact group (483.4 ± 83.9 milliseconds). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with contact ACL injury demonstrated a slower LEVMRT while their ACLR limb was stabilizing. The group differences during the ACLR-stable LEVMRT task might indicate deficits in perceptual-motor function when the surgical limb maintains postural control during a reaction time task. After ACLR, individuals with contact injuries may need additional motor learning interventions to enhance perceptual-motor functioning.

Psychological Readiness, Injury-Related Fear, and Persistent Knee Symptoms After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Poor psychological responses after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been associated with a failure to return to sport and increased secondary injury risk. However, we do not know whether poor psychological responses after ACLR influence patient-reported knee function and knee symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between psychological factors (ie, psychological readiness and injury-related fear) and the presence of persistent knee symptoms in individuals 6 to 12 months after ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: In total, 101 participants, aged 13 to 25 years old, between 6 and 12 months after primary unilateral ACLR were enrolled in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Persistent knee symptoms were identified using an established criterion based on the subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Participants also completed the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) to assess psychological readiness and injury-related fear, respectively. Higher ACL-RSI scores indicate higher psychological readiness, and higher TSK-11 scores indicate higher injury-related fear. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants (29%) met the criteria for persistent knee symptoms. For every 1 SD lower in the ACL-RSI score, participants had 2.1 times greater odds of persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (95% CI = 1.3, 3.6). For every 1 SD higher in the TSK-11 score, participants had 1.9 times greater odds of persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (95% CI = 1.1, 3.3). Both the ACL-RSI and TSK-11 were considered good at classifying persistent knee symptoms, as the areas under the curve were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with a lower level of psychological readiness and more injury-related fear after ACLR had greater odds of persistent knee symptoms. Overall, these results highlight the potential clinical benefit of a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to managing health and wellness for individuals after ACLR.

Sustained Limb-Level Loading: A Ground Reaction Force Phenotype Common to Individuals at High Risk for and Those With Knee Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the vertical (vGRF), anterior-posterior (apGRF), and medial-lateral (mlGRF) ground reaction force (GRF) profiles throughout the stance phase of gait (1) between individuals 6 to 12 months post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured matched controls and (2) between ACLR and individuals with differing radiographic severities of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), defined as Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grades KL2, KL3, and KL4. METHODS: A total of 196 participants were included in this retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Gait biomechanics were collected from individuals 6 to 12 months post-ACLR (n = 36), uninjured controls matched to the ACLR group (n = 36), and individuals with KL2 (n = 31), KL3 (n = 67), and KL4 osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 26). Between-group differences in vGRF, apGRF, and mlGRF were assessed in reference to the ACLR group throughout each percentage of stance phase using a functional linear model. RESULTS: The ACLR group demonstrated lower vGRF and apGRF in early and late stance compared to the uninjured controls, with large effects (Cohen's d range: 1.35-1.66). Conversely, the ACLR group exhibited greater vGRF (87%-90%; 4.88% body weight [BW]; d = 0.75) and apGRF (84%-94%; 2.41% BW; d = 0.79) than the KL2 group in a small portion of late stance. No differences in mlGRF profiles were observed between the ACLR and either the uninjured controls or the KL2 group. The magnitude of difference in GRF profiles between the ACLR and OA groups increased with OA disease severity. CONCLUSION: Individuals 6 to 12 months post-ACLR exhibit strikingly similar GRF profiles as individuals with KL2 KOA, suggesting both patient groups may benefit from targeted interventions to address aberrant GRF profiles.

Femoral cartilage ultrasound echo-intensity is a valid measure of cartilage composition.

This study aimed to create a conversion equation that accurately predicts cartilage magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 relaxation times using ultrasound echo-intensity and common participant demographics. We recruited 15 participants with a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between the ages of 18 and 35 years at 1-5 years after surgery. A single investigator completed a transverse suprapatellar scan with the ACLR limb in max knee flexion to image the femoral trochlea cartilage. A single reader manually segmented the femoral cartilage cross-sectional area to assess the echo-intensity (i.e., mean gray-scale pixel value). At a separate visit, a T2 mapping sequence with the MRI beam set to an oblique angle was used to image the femoral trochlea cartilage. A single reader manually segmented the cartilage cross-sectional area on a single MRI slice to assess the T2 relaxation time. A stepwise, multiple linear regression was used to predict T2 relaxation time from cartilage echo-intensity and common demographic variables. We created a conversion equation using the regression betas and then used an ICC and Bland-Altman plot to assess agreement between the estimated and true T2 relaxation time. Cartilage ultrasound echo-intensity and age significantly predicted T2 relaxation time (F = 7.33, p = 0.008, R2 = 0.55). When using the new conversion equation to estimate T2 relaxation time from cartilage echo-intensity and age, there was strong agreement between the estimated and true T2 relaxation time (ICC2,k = 0.84). This study provides promising preliminary data that cartilage echo-intensity combined with age can be used as a clinically accessible tool for evaluating cartilage composition.

Rectus Femoris Ultrasound Echo Intensity Is a Valid Estimate of Percent Intramuscular Fat in Patients Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the work described here was to evaluate quadriceps muscle ultrasound metrics and common demographic variables to create a conversion equation that validly predicts magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) percent intramuscular fat after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: We recruited 15 participants between the ages of 18 and 35 y who were 1-5 y post-ACLR. For the MRI assessment, we used an iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) sequence to assess the mid-thigh. A single reader manually segmented the rectus femoris on two consecutive MRI slices using ITK-Snap to estimate the percent intramuscular fat. For the ultrasound assessment, a single investigator captured transverse panoramic ultrasound images of the mid-thigh with the participant positioned supine and the knee flexed to 30°. A separate single reader used ImageJ to manually segment the rectus femoris ultrasound images. Ultrasound metrics included muscle cross-sectional area, echo intensity and subcutaneous fat thickness. A stepwise linear multiple regression was used to develop an equation to predict MRI percent intramuscular fat using the ultrasound metrics and common demographics (i.e., age, sex, height, mass). Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,k) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the agreement between true and estimated percent intramuscular fat. RESULTS: Echo intensity and age significantly predicted MRI intramuscular fat percent (p = 0.003, r2 = 0.62). When using the conversion equation, there was high agreement (ICC2,k = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.96) between the estimated and true percent intramuscular fat. CONCLUSION: Our patient population-specific conversion equation that uses quadriceps muscle ultrasound echo intensity and age is a valid estimate of MRI percent intramuscular fat.

The Impact of Meniscal Tear Type and Surgical Treatment on Quadriceps Strength: A Study of Adolescent Patients Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of meniscal injuries at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can result in restrictions on weightbearing and range of motion in the early rehabilitative phases. What is unknown is the effect of (1) meniscal tear type and location at the time of anterior cruciate ligament injury and (2) meniscal treatment at the time of ACLR on quadriceps strength in adolescents during the late rehabilitative phase. HYPOTHESIS: Meniscal tears involving the root and requiring repair would adversely affect quadriceps strength at 6 to 9 months postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent ACLR at 1 of 2 research sites between 2013 and 2021 were identified. Adolescent participants were included if they were between the ages of 12 and 20 years at the time of assessment and had undergone primary unilateral ACLR in the previous 6 to 9 months. Participants were subgrouped by meniscal tear type (no tear, nonroot tear, root tear) and meniscal treatment at the time of ACLR (no treatment, meniscectomy, meniscal repair), which were confirmed via chart review. Isokinetic strength testing occurred at 60 deg/s, and quadriceps strength and quadriceps strength limb symmetry index were compared between the meniscal tear type and meniscal procedure subgroups using analysis of covariance while controlling for the effects of age, sex, and ACLR graft source. RESULTS: An overall 236 patients were included in this analysis (109 male, 127 female; mean ± SD age, 16.0 ± 1.9 years). There were no significant differences in ACLR limb quadriceps strength based on meniscal tear type (P = .61) or meniscal procedure at the time of ACLR (P = .61), after controlling for age, biological sex, and ACLR graft source. Similarly, quadriceps strength limb symmetry index did not differ by meniscal tear type (P = .38) or meniscal procedure at the time of ACLR (P = .40). CONCLUSION: Meniscal tear type and treatment at the time of ACLR did not affect quadriceps strength or quadriceps strength symmetry in adolescents 6 to 9 months after ACLR.

Preventing Osteoarthritis After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: An Osteoarthritis Action Alliance Consensus Statement.

After an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, people need secondary prevention strategies to identify osteoarthritis at its earliest stages so that interventions can be implemented to halt or slow the progression toward its long-term burden. The Osteoarthritis Action Alliance formed an interdisciplinary Secondary Prevention Task Group to develop a consensus on recommendations to provide clinicians with secondary prevention strategies that are intended to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis after a person has an ACL injury. The group achieved consensus on 15 out of 16 recommendations that address patient education, exercise and rehabilitation, psychological skills training, graded-exposure therapy, cognitive-behavioral counseling (lacked consensus), outcomes to monitor, secondary injury prevention, system-level social support, leveraging technology, and coordinated care models. We hope this statement raises awareness among clinicians and researchers on the importance of taking steps to mitigate the risk of osteoarthritis after an ACL injury.

Evidence Review for Preventing Osteoarthritis After an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: An Osteoarthritis Action Alliance Consensus Statement.

CONTEXT: The Osteoarthritis Action Alliance formed a secondary prevention task group to develop a consensus on secondary prevention recommendations to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis after a knee injury. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to provide clinicians with secondary prevention recommendations that are intended to reduce the risk of osteoarthritis after a person has sustained an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Specifically, this manuscript describes our methods, literature reviews, and dissenting opinions to elaborate on the rationale for our recommendations and to identify critical gaps. DESIGN: Consensus process. SETTING: Virtual video conference calls and online voting. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: The Secondary Prevention Task Group consisted of 29 members from various clinical backgrounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The group initially convened online in August 2020 to discuss the target population, goals, and key topics. After a second call, the task group divided into 9 subgroups to draft the recommendations and supportive text for crucial content areas. Twenty-one members completed 2 rounds of voting and revising the recommendations and supportive text between February and April 2021. A virtual meeting was held to review the wording of the recommendations and obtain final votes. We defined consensus as >80% of voting members supporting a proposed recommendation. RESULTS: The group achieved consensus on 15 of 16 recommendations. The recommendations address patient education, exercise and rehabilitation, psychological skills training, graded-exposure therapy, cognitive-behavioral counseling (lacked consensus), outcomes to monitor, secondary injury prevention, system-level social support, leveraging technology, and coordinated care models. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus statement reflects information synthesized from an interdisciplinary group of experts based on the best available evidence from the literature or personal experience. We hope this document raises awareness among clinicians and researchers to take steps to mitigate the risk of osteoarthritis after an anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Psychological Readiness and Injury-Related Fear are Associated with Persistent Knee Symptoms after ACL Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Poor psychological responses after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been associated with failure to return to sport and increased secondary injury risk. However, we do not know whether poor psychological responses after ACLR influence patient-reported knee function and knee symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between psychological factors (i.e., psychological readiness and injury-related fear) and the presence of persistent knee symptoms in individuals 6-12 months after ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional. SETTING: Research Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and two participants, ages 13-25 years old, between 6 and 12 months post primary, unilateral ACLR were enrolled in the study. INTERVENTIONS(S): Persistent knee symptoms was identified using an established criterion based on the subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants also completed the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophhobia-11 (TSK-11) to assess psychological readiness and injury-related fear, respectfully. Higher ACL-RSI scores indicate higher psychological readiness and higher TSK-11 scores indicate higher injury-related fear. RESULTS: Seventy participants (69%) met the criteria for persistent knee symptoms. For every standard deviation (SD) lower in ACL-RSI, a participants had 8.6 times greater odds of having persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (CI95: 3.3, 22.4). For every SD higher in TSK-11, a participants had 3.9 times greater odds of having persistent knee symptoms after ACLR (CI95: 2.1, 7.4). Both the ACL-RSI and TSK-11 were considered "good" at classifying persistent knee symptoms as areas under the curve were 0.88 and 0.83, respectfully. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with lower psychological readiness and higher injury-related fear after ACLR have greater odds of experiencing persistent knee symptoms. Overall, these results highlight the potential clinical benefit for a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to managing health and wellness for individuals after ACLR.

Meniscal degeneration is prognostic of destabilzing meniscal tear and accelerated knee osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic potential of magnetic resonance (MR)-detected meniscal degeneration in relation to incident destabilizing meniscal tears (radial, complex, root, or macerated) or accelerated knee osteoarthritis (AKOA). We used existing MR data from a case-control study of three groups from the Osteoarthritis Initiative without radiographic KOA at baseline: AKOA, typical KOA, and no KOA. From these groups, we included people without medial and lateral meniscal tear at baseline (n = 226) and 48-month meniscal data (n = 221). Intermediate-weighted fat-suppressed MR images annually from baseline to the 48-month visit were graded using a semiquantitative meniscal tear classification criterion. Incident destabilizing meniscal tear was defined as progressing from an intact meniscus to a destabilizing tear by the 48-month visit. We used two logistic regression models to assess whether: (1) presence of medial meniscal degeneration was associated with an incident medial destabilizing meniscal tear, and (2) presence of meniscal degeneration in either meniscus was associated with incident AKOA over the next 4 years. People with the presence of a medial meniscal degeneration had three times the odds of developing an incident destabilizing medial meniscal tear within 4 years compared with a person without medial meniscus degeneration (odds ratio [OR]: 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-6.59). People with meniscal degeneration had five times the odds of developing incident AKOA within 4 years compared with a person without meniscal degeneration in either meniscus (OR: 5.04; 95% CI: 2.57-9.89). Meniscal degeneration on MR is clinically meaningful as it relates to future poor outcomes.

Kinesiophobia Is Associated with Peak Knee Abduction Angle during Jump Landing after ACL Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the associations between kinesiophobia, knee abduction angle (KAA) during the first 100 ms of landing, and knee flexion excursion (KFE) in individuals 5-12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We hypothesized that greater kinesiophobia would be associated with greater peak KAA and lesser KFE during landing on the ACLR limb, but not on the contralateral limb. METHODS: Thirty-six participants between 14 and 35 yr old (females = 19, age = 19.9 ± 5.1 yr, height = 172.5 ± 9.4 cm, weight = 76.7 ± 20.0 kg, time since surgery =7.2 ± 1.7 months) were recruited from a sports medicine clinic at 5-12 months after primary unilateral ACLR. Participants completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) to measure kinesiophobia and three successful trials of a standard drop vertical jump task. A 10-camera three-dimensional motion capture system synchronized with two embedded force plate platforms was used to capture jump-landing kinematics. Separate stepwise linear regression models were used to examine the associations between kinesiophobia, peak KAA, and KFE on the ACLR and contralateral limbs after accounting for time since surgery and biological sex. RESULTS: When accounting for time since surgery and biological sex, every 1-point increase on the TSK-11 (i.e., increase in kinesiophobia) associated with a 0.37° increase (i.e., a 7.1% increase) in ACLR limb KAA ( P = 0.02). Kinesiophobia was not associated with contralateral limb KAA, ACLR limb KFE, or contralateral limb KFE. CONCLUSIONS: Higher kinesiophobia was related to greater amounts of peak KAA during landing in individuals 5-12 months post-ACLR. Modifying kinesiophobia may help to decrease KAA and lead to reduced secondary ACL injury risk. Future research should investigate feasible psychological interventions to reduce kinesiophobia and improve KAA in patients post-ACLR.

Age-, Sex-, and Graft-Specific Reference Values From 783 Adolescent Patients at 5 to 7 Months After ACL Reconstruction: IKDC, Pedi-IKDC, KOOS, ACL-RSI, Single-Leg Hop, and Thigh Strength.

OBJECTIVE: To describe age-, sex-, and graft source-specific reference values for patient-reported, physical function, and strength outcome measures in adolescents at 5 to 7 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data were collected at 3 universities and 2 children's hospitals. The participants completed at least one of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Evaluation Form, Pediatric IKDC (Pedi-IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale. Participants also completed single-leg hop tests and/or isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength assessments (at 60°/s). Reference values were summarized using descriptive statistics and stratified for age, sex, and graft source. RESULTS: Reference values were reported for common patient-reported outcomes and measures of physical function and strength from 783 participants (56% females, age = 16. 4 ± 2.0 years) who were in early adolescence (12-14 years, N = 183, 52% females), middle adolescence (15-17 years, N = 456, 58% females), or late adolescence (18-20 years, N = 144, 55% females). Three hundred seventy-nine participants (48.4%) received a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, 292 participants (37.3%) received hamstring tendon autograft, and 112 participants (14.3%) received autograft or allograft from an alternative source. CONCLUSION: Reference values for common patient-reported outcomes and measures of physical function and strength differed depending on a patient's age, sex, and graft source. Using patient-specific reference values, in addition to previously described age-appropriate cutoff values, may help clinicians monitor and progress patients through rehabilitation and return to physical activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(4):1-8. Epub: 23 January 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11389.

Validation of a Survey to Characterize Barriers to Physical Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Although 84% of patients expected to return to activity within 1 year of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), as few as 24% will return to their preinjury level of activity. By considering a patient's perceptions of reengagement in activity after ACLR, clinicians and researchers may be better equipped to implement interventions that are patient centered. OBJECTIVE: To describe the validation of the ACL Reasons survey, a tool to aid clinicians and researchers in understanding patient perceptions of barriers to physical activity (PA) engagement after ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: The ACL Reasons survey was administered via Qualtrics to 78 patients 6 to 24 months after primary, unilateral ACLR. Patients were categorized as active, more challenging, or less active based on their responses to the ACL Reasons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of the ACL Reasons survey occurred via an iterative process of drafting and revising based on feedback from a team of external expert reviewers. Tegner activity level, Marx activity score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), ACL Return to Sport after Injury score, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia score were compared among groups using analysis-of-variance and Kruskal Wallis tests. RESULTS: Groups differed based on Tegner activity level (P < .001), Marx activity score (P = .01), KOOS pain score (P = .02), KOOS symptom score (P = .04), KOOS sports and recreation score (P < .001), KOOS quality of life score (P < .001), ACL Return to Sport after Injury score (P < .001), and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia score (P < .001), with the less active group performing worse on each. Knee symptoms, fear of knee symptoms or movement, and fear of injury were the most common reasons for the change in PA engagement. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the validity of the ACL Reasons survey as a tool for identifying barriers to PA engagement after ACLR. This tool may help facilitate communication between patients with ACLR and their health care providers to enhance patient-centered care.

Quadriceps Strength and Knee-Related Symptom State 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: Isometric quadriceps strength metrics and patient-reported outcomes are commonly used in return-to-sport assessments in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Patients may experience clinical knee-related symptoms aggravating enough to seek additional medical care after ACLR. In addition to seeking additional medical care, these patient-reported clinical knee-related symptoms may also influence function after ACLR. However, whether an association exists between these common quadriceps metrics and the patient-reported clinical knee-related symptom state is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine if meeting isometric quadriceps strength and symmetry criteria is associated with acceptable clinical knee-related symptoms at 5 to 7 months post-ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Laboratories. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: We classified individuals at 5 to 7 months post-ACLR based on their isometric ACLR and uninvolved-limb quadriceps strength or quadriceps strength symmetry. We also dichotomized participants based on the Englund et al criteria for unacceptable clinical knee-related symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Quadriceps strength variables were compared between groups using analysis of covariance, and the relative risk of a participant in each quadriceps strength group reporting acceptable clinical knee-related symptoms was determined using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 173 individuals participated. The isometric quadriceps strength and limb symmetry index were different (P < .001) between quadriceps strength groups. Those categorized as both strong and symmetric had a 1.28 (95% CI = 0.94, 1.74) and individuals categorized as symmetric only had a 1.29 (95% CI = 0.97, 1.73) times greater relative risk of reporting acceptable clinical knee-related symptoms compared with the neither strong nor symmetric group. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of individuals (85%) recovering from ACLR failed to meet either the clinical quadriceps strength or symmetry criteria at 5 to 7 months post-ACLR. Quadriceps strength and quadriceps strength symmetry are clinically important but may not be primary determinants of the clinical knee-related symptom state within the first 6 months post-ACLR.

Do the General Public and Health Care Professionals Think That Running Is Bad for the Knees? A Cross-sectional International Multilanguage Online Survey.

Background: Running is a popular sport with widely recognized health benefits. Given the high rates of knee injury in runners and the growing prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), it may be useful to assess perceptions about running and knee joint health. Purpose: The objectives of this study were to (1) explore and compare the perceptions of the general public (PUB) and health care professionals (HCPs) on the topic of running and knee health and (2) explore recommendations about running and knee health provided by HCPs. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: We conducted an online survey between June 18 and October 1, 2020. The questionnaire included questions on running and knee health, and HCPs were asked about their typical recommendations and level of confidence in providing recommendations on the topic. Perceptions (proportions) were compared between the PUB and HCPs using the chi-square test. Results: In total, 4521 responses (PUB, n = 2514; HCPs, n = 2007) were analyzed. A greater proportion of HCPs perceived regular running as healthy for knees (86% vs 68%; P < .001). More of the PUB than HCPs (P < .001) believed that running frequently (29% vs 13%), long distances (54% vs 45%), and on hard surfaces (60% vs 36%) increased the risk of developing KOA. Running for those with KOA was perceived by the PUB as posing an increased risk of getting more knee pain (48%) and needing joint replacement surgery (38%), more so than by HCPs (26% and 17%, respectively). The majority of HCPs reported being relatively confident in providing evidence-based recommendations about running and knee health and mostly recommended that runners with KOA modify training parameters instead of quit. Conclusion: More HCPs perceived running as healthy for knees when compared with the PUB. Most HCPs felt confident in providing evidence-based recommendations about running and knee health.

Association Between Walking for Exercise and Symptomatic and Structural Progression in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between walking for exercise and symptomatic and structural disease progression in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: We assessed a nested cohort of participants age 50 years or older within the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a community-based observational study in which subjects were enrolled between 2004 and 2006. We focused on 4 dichotomous outcomes from baseline to the 48-month visit, involving determination of the frequency of knee pain and radiographic severity of knee OA on posteroanterior semiflexed knee radiographs. The outcomes assessed included 1) new frequent knee pain, 2) worsening of radiographic severity of knee OA based on the Kellgren/Lawrence grade, 3) progression of medial joint space narrowing, and 4) improved frequent knee pain. We used a modified version of the Historical Physical Activity Survey Instrument to ascertain those subjects who reported walking for exercise after age 50 years. The survey was administered at the 96-month visit (2012-2014). RESULTS: Of 1,212 participants with knee OA, 45% were male and 73% reported walking for exercise. The mean ± SD age was 63.2 ± 7.9 years, and the mean ± SD body mass index was 29.4 ± 4.6 kg/m2 . The likelihood of new frequent knee pain was reduced in participants with knee OA who walked for exercise as compared to those who were non-walkers (odds ratio [OR] 0.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.4-0.8), and progression of medial joint space narrowing was less common in walkers compared to non-walkers (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-1.0). CONCLUSION: In individuals with knee OA who were age 50 years or older, walking for exercise was associated with less frequent development of knee pain. These findings support the notion that walking for exercise should be encouraged for people with knee OA. Furthermore, we offer a proof of concept that walking for exercise could be disease modifying, which warrants further study.